Research
Neural Markers of Forgetting
Forgetting is a natural and important process, but what does it actually look like in the brain? To find out, we measure brain activity while participants complete memory tasks, using tools like electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Understanding how context is represented in the brain, and how that representation shifts over time, requires more than tracking overall changes in neural activity. We also need to examine distributed patterns of activity, using techniques like multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and representational similarity analysis (RSA). We additionally use EEG frequency tagging, a technique for tagging a stimulus with a distinct neural signal, to track how specific contextual details are reactivated or forgotten over the course of a study. These tools let us see forgetting unfold moment to moment, not just measure its aftermath.
Selected papers
- Hubbard*, R. & Sahakyan, L. (2023). Differential recruitment of inhibitory control processes by directed forgetting and thought substitution. Journal of Neuroscience PDF
- Chiu*, Y., Wang, T., Beck, D., Lewis-Peacock, J., & Sahakyan, L. (2021). Separation of item and context in item-method directed forgetting. NeuroImage, 235, 117983. PDF
- Hubbard*, R. & Sahakyan, L. (2021). Separable neural mechanisms support intentional forgetting and thought substitution. Cortex, 142, pp.317-331. PDF
- Manning, J., Hulbert, J., Williams, J., Piloto, L. R., Sahakyan, L., & Norman, K. (2016). A neural evidence of intentional forgetting via contextual flushing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1534-1542 PDF
* indicates graduate student authors from this lab